Home | Contact Us | Site Map

Home
What We Do
Why Walker
Meet Your Inspector
Skip on TV
Skip in the News
Skip's Published Articles
Sample Reports
Photoelectric Smoke Alarms
Indoor Air Quality
Radon Testing
BAAQMD Fireplace Reg's
Home Energy Efficiency
Industry Information
Reference Information
Photoelectric vs. Ionization Smoke Alarms

 

Collection of Residential Smoke Alarm Research

This report was scanned from hardcopy. 

Combination Smoke Alarms - A Dangerous Compromise, Dean Dennis

"Ionization detectors are many minutes slow to alarm in a smoldering fire but seconds faster in a flaming fire when compared to a photoelectric detector."

"Most people die from smoke inhalation."

"Ionization detectors alarm at a much greater rate than photoelectric detectors."

"The easy path might be to keep quiet or reach simplistic conclusions and tell us dual-sensors are the way to go.  It would be easy to take a non-controversial stance that would please everybody and allow everyone that promoted ionization detectors to save face." 

"...in court testimony during the notable Mercer case (Mercer v. BRK/Pitway), when an ionization detector failed to alarm resulting in the death of a child, a company official testified that the dual-sensor alarm is desensitized versus the stand alone technology."

'What seems clear is that the dual-sensor detector is a convenient compromise.  It is a mistake that will cost lives."

See Page 92 of PDF

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright 2004-2017 - Walker Property Evaluation Services